[...] Any additional indicator (and source)?
Number or percentage of journals with a BOAI-compatible, free and open license (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). Source: DOAJ.
https://doaj.org/search?source... Federico Leva, 17/06/2018 17:04
Number of journals with open peer review (possibly filtered by DOAJ seal to ensure data quality). Source: DOAJ.
https://doaj.org/search?source... Federico Leva, 17/06/2018 17:05
Number of open access journals hosted and fully owned by universities or university consortia or other academic-controlled non-profit entities. Source: DOAJ with manual filtering, or a new tag.
Federico Leva, 17/06/2018 17:09
Percentage of open citations (deposited by publishers on CrossRef). Source: I4OC.
https://i4oc.org/#progress Federico Leva, 17/06/2018 17:35
I think that citations to open access research within patents would be interesting to capture. Could use lens.org.
Ashley Farley, 19/06/2018 04:41
I want an journal metric that shows the take the DORA serious, and do not actually use the false JIF metric.
Egon Willighⓐgen, 01/07/2018 11:16
Add open data policies
Add policies about material and method section
J. Colomb, @pen, 02/07/2018 12:51
Cost of OA publishing per journal/publisher.
Etienne Gaudrain, 02/07/2018 12:57
I think APCs should be included and monitored. At the same time, also pre-print and post-print policies need to be considered. A quantitative indicator to be included can be the embargo period.
Alessandro Sarretta, 04/07/2018 01:34
Number of journals that allow preprints, and postprints, and what their embargo periods are.
Suggest also looking at the OAS evaluation tool:
https://www.tandfonline.com/do...
The fact that the Avoin Tiede report for measuring the openness of journals and publishers has not been included here, nor any of the evaluation criteria within, is deeply concerning.
https://www.tandfonline.com/do... Jon Tennant, 06/07/2018 18:57
Other things: Journals that accept articles based on soundness only; journals that use registered reports; journals that encourage reproducibility studies; journals that encourage publication of 'negative results'. These are all key aspects of open science that are missing.
Jon Tennant, 06/07/2018 18:58
Furthermore, journals that still advertise impact factors in some form should be included in this.
Jon Tennant, 06/07/2018 19:03
Publishers' policy. You might include here also book publishers.
Elena Giglia, 30/08/2018 13:36
You might consider also adding publishers' policies, in order to also include book publishers.
OPERAS, 31/08/2018 08:54
openly licensed open access of back volumes back to vol 1 issue 1
Jeroen Bosman, 31/08/2018 21:46
percentage of papers in the full publication history of the journal that are OA
Jeroen Bosman, 31/08/2018 21:47
journals with policies preventing re-enclosure after selling the title to another publisher
Jeroen Bosman, 31/08/2018 21:48
Number of diamond/platina journals and papers therein
Jeroen Bosman, 31/08/2018 22:04